James Higgins

My feedback

  1. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Adobe Dimension: Feature Requests » Rendering  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the suggestion! I’d love to know here if rendering was faster would you prefer smart objects in Dimension so you can place the new graphics in 3D? The reason I ask is mostly because if we bake the materials and lighting down to 2D there’s a bit more limitation on what you could do with the PS smart object. For example replacing the packaging label wouldn’t update to show in reflections or refractions in the rest of the scene. Is that an okay limitation?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Higgins commented  · 

    Personally a PS smart object would be fine for my requirements. I create a lot of product picture style files for websites (White background, single item to display the product, only change with a lot of the products is the label, the container is the same) So reflection and refraction doesn't bother me as much, plus it will allow me to apply the product label in a higher quality then Dimension currently seems to render.

    James Higgins shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe Dimension: Feature Requests » Import / Export  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Higgins shared this idea  · 
  3. 71 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Adobe Dimension: Feature Requests » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Higgins commented  · 

    Being able to add simulated liquid into my objects would be a real time saver. I'm currently placing a slightly scaled down copy inside of the original bottle with a cut out where I want to liquid level to be. This works fine until the bottle is placed at any kind of angle and the liquid remains perfectly level, which isn't very realistic.

    James Higgins supported this idea  · 
  4. 58 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Adobe Dimension: Feature Requests » Materials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey everyone! I saw a good number of new questions here, so thought I’d respond to everyone with an update. Unfortunately we still don’t have true ‘vector’ support in Dimension.

    Whatever ‘size’ and resolution your vector is in Illustrator is what it’s going to be applied as in Dimension. When importing to Dimension we convert it to a .png and use that.

    I recommend using a minimum of about 1000×1000 size images from Ai or Ps. 2000×2000 is better. 4000×4000 is best! ;D

    This quality reduction can also be cause because of the way 3D models work. The entire image you use is shared across the model and then only as a part of the canvas based on camera zoom. So you could be zooming in to part of the model and rendering it at a higher resolution than the graphic was originally.

    Decal resolution can also be affected by…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Higgins commented  · 

    Having the decals render at their full resolution would be great. The rest of the model renders in flawlessly and looks fantastic, so really happy with the software there, but it is unfortunately held back by the decal quality which is almost always blurry and grainy, even when rendering at 32bit high quality with very high resolution files created in Illustrator.

    My clients love the prospect of using renders as their primary product pictures and even included them in their advertising material. Unfortunately the quality of the decals on the products are the only things turning them away from the idea.

    James Higgins supported this idea  · 
  5. 193 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hey everyone. There’s been a lot of discussion here, and some of it is turning quite negative. I was going to wait, but wanted to jump in right away.

    We have absolutely been listening and, as mentioned before, have GPU rendering in progress. We have our first build testing in-house right now and will be making it available on Prerelease soon.

    Please, note this first release of GPU rendering will be Windows Nvidia only, on cards that support RTX raytracing technology. Plans for AMD and Mac is still in the works but won’t be happening this year.

    You can join our prerelease program with this invitation link: https://www.adobeprerelease.com/beta/6D4BC437-A571-40B6-B398-1D29A4A13985/participate/7A1DBA5A-6CF2-4023-EE2F-3CA7B25DF3BE

    Or if you’re already a member just visit www.adobeprerelease.com and visit the Dimension program.

    We hope to upload our first GPU enabled build later this week.

    Cloud rendering is in NO WAY a replacement or way to evade doing work to support…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Higgins commented  · 

    Currently limited to rendering only via my CPU. While it meets the requirements for using the program the rendering times are still very long and being able to allocate my GPU to the task would speed up times substantially while keeping my machine usable via the CPU.

    James Higgins supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base